Wednesday, February 11, 2009

The Ever Controversial Prologue


I'm always thrilled when Renee Ryan stops by for a visit. Give this woman a craft topic and she's ready and able to discuss it. What's more, she makes so much sense. I'm particularly pleased that her February release THE MARSHAL TAKES A BRIDE is finally here. Today you're in luck because Renee will be drawing a name to give away an autographed copy to one lucky person who leaves a comment. Please welcome The Five Scribes' guest author, Renee Ryan.


Thanks to the Five Scribes for inviting me here today. I love discussing all things writing, especially the controversial. And let’s face it; prologues are right up there in the controversial category. Let me start by saying the only writing rule I ever adhere to is this one: There are no rules. In fact, for every hard and fast rule I’ve seen or heard, I’ve also witnessed a talented author break it beautifully and seamlessly. I could do an entire blog on the many examples that come to mind. But today I’m going to focus on the topic of prologues.


I recently sat in a workshop given by a very well-known author who categorically bashed prologues with a curled lip and vitriolic fervor. He basically said, “There is no reason, ever, to put a prologue in your story. He encouraged us to never write a prologue. Never, never, never.”


Well, I firmly disagree with this famous author. Case in point, I am writing a contracted novel in which my editor is requiring me to include a prologue. That’s right. My editor is insisting I add a prologue. With good reason. The entire story is contingent on a lone event that occurs a full month prior to the rest of the book. In order to make the story work, and not feel disjointed, this scene must be included in the opening of the novel as a prologue. Without it, I would have to add pages and pages of back story dump.


Now, let me state for the record, I hate back story dump, which brings me to my reasons for including a prologue in a book.


  1. To avoid back story dump. If the opening of your story is dependent on a prior event, and that event is filled with powerful action and emotion, then I say write the scene in real time. In other words, if you find yourself “telling” the specifics of a prior event, you might want to ask yourself, “Would this be more effective written in real time?” If the answer is yes, you need a prologue.

  1. To avoid a large jump in time between the first and second scene of a story. Whether an event occurs one month prior to the opening or twenty years in the past, if this event is important to the story, write it as a prologue.

  1. To provide motivation for a character’s actions in the opening of the story. Have you ever had someone say to you, “Your hero (or heroine) isn’t sympathetic?” Well, if a character is acting in a way that seems harsh, but he or she has a specific reason for acting this way, you could “show” the reason in a short prologue. And if this event is linked to the past, even better.

  1. To present a seemingly unrelated event that will have a huge impact on the external plot. This type of prologue is often seen in mysteries and thrillers. If an event, usually a murder, catapults the external plot but isn’t part of the hero and/or heroine’s main storyline, it’s often effective to present this scene as a prologue. It’s also a nice way to start off the story with live action rather than having to “explain” why this murder or event is important.

If you haven’t noticed already, let me point out something very important here. There is one noticeably similar thread to the four reasons I’ve presented for using a prologue. An event.


Basically, no matter which of the above four reasons you chose to write a prologue, that additional scene must be a specific event. It needs to have a direct impact on the external or internal plot and have a powerful emotional impact on the reader.


If you’re writing a prologue for any other reason than the four I mentioned above, if the prologue isn’t a live action “event”, I highly suggest you rethink it. But remember my only rule, there are no rules. If you want to write a prologue, go for it! Just try to have a solid reason for doing so.


Thanks again for having me here today. I’m a frequent visitor of this blog and always come away with a new insight. I consider it an honor to share my thoughts on prologues with all of you today.


Like I mentioned above, I’ll be giving away a free copy of my February release, THE MARSHAL TAKES A BRIDE. Although there’s no prologue in this book, two of my next four books do have action-packed, emotional prologues. Well, I think so anyway.


Renee Ryan writes for the Steeple Hill line Love Inspired Historical. Her fabulous editor is Melissa Endlich of Steeple Hill. Her first book in the Charity House series, The Marshall Takes a Bride is a February 2009 release. Her next book in the series, Hannah’s Beau, hits the shelves July 2009. For further information check out www.reneeryan.com

18 comments:

Renee Ryan said...

Good morning to the Five Scribes! Thanks for having me here today.

So, does anyone have any other thoughts on Prologues? Good, bad, indifferent?

~Renee~

Donnell said...

Good morning, Ms. Early Bird. I'm sure people are climbing out of bed and putting on coffee. Thanks so much for this article. I think it's overdue and timely! I'll disqualify myself from your wonderful book but have to say I loved it! You're on a roll, Ms. Ryan!

Keri Ford said...

Morning, Renee. I've never had much of a problem with prologue unless they don't seem to add much to the story.

But I do have a question about something that's always tumbled my mind. What's the difference between doing a prologue and simply starting with Chapter 1 with Chapter 2 being 20 years later?

I've seen both used and have never figured out the difference.

Renee Ryan said...

Hi Donnell,

No need to be impressed with my early rising. I'm on East Coast time -- two hours later than you. ;-)

Keri,

Excellent question. Really, there isn't any difference. More than likely, the author who decides to write a twenty-year break between Chapter One and Two is adverse to slapping the word prologue on the Chapter One.

The other reason might be the length of Chapter One. Most prologues are shorter than a normal chapter, so if the writer has a long opening scene they might decide to label it as a first chapter.

Does that help?

Donnell said...

Ah, back to another unwritten *rule* keep prologues short. Which I happen to prefer, but will decide for myself ;) I hadn't thought of that, Renee. When I see someone starting a chapter one with a significant time lapse, I think oh, he/she is trying to avoid the ever controversial prologue. I never thought about length. Very interesting.

Jen said...

Hi Renee,
Thank you for an excellent post! New authors sometimes feel beaten down by the rules, which I find tragic since it seems to strip away that sense of uninhibited writing. I also agree wholeheartedly with the breaking of said "rules". It can sometimes make for a much better book. I really like the way you've broken out the uses for prologue in such a logical way. I've written two (way before I knew about rules and RWA or attended any craft workshop) and am quite happy to find I inadvertently followed your advice. Yay! It's wonderful information such as this that will help other writers keep writing without fear, so thank you!

Edie said...

Renee, great post! Allison Brennan said the same thing about her first book. Her editor told her to write a prologue. If a book needed one, I wouldn't hesitate.

Vince said...

Hi Renee:

As a reader I like prologues. (If they are short). Almost always the prologue acts as a hook and sets up the story quicker. This makes the story ‘run’ faster. Long prologues make me angry because I think, “I’ve got to read all this just so I can understand the beginning of the story you actually intended to write?”

To me that’s like having to watch twenty minutes of commercials before the start of the feature movie at a theater. I get even more upset with the long prologue author when it takes half the book before the prologue material makes any sense or comes into play. My rule is: the longer the prologue, the faster it has to come into play in the main story. This is a very strong reason for just calling it Chapter One.

I also get upset with authors who claim that, if you were only as superior a writer as they are, you would never have to write a prologue or even a tombstone. (E.g., Reno, Nevada, Summer, 1881). As a reader, I love tombstones.

These 'superior' authors claim you can always, slowly, reveal facts to fill in the back story and make these revelations part of the unfolding action. You probably can. So, why is that better? Is it only better because it proves you are a more clever author? Has anyone thought, “what does this mean to a reader’?

I am convinced that readers like short prologues and this is why editors want them. I will also venture to bet that short prologues play an important part in “point of purchase’ sales in books stores.

BTW, I loved your “The Marshall Takes a Bride“ but it worn me out. It reminds me of that movie where the lady was driving a bus full of people and the bus had a bomb in it that would explode if the bus even when below 50 miles per hour. She had to drive like crazy for the whole movie. That movie also worn me out. Indeed, I think ‘The Marshall Takes a Bride’ would translate very well to the big screen.

Vince

Renee Ryan said...

Jen,

I find voracious readers who turn to writing have strong instincts and follow "rules" they didn't know they were following. So, I'm guessing you're a voracious reader???

~Renee~

Renee Ryan said...

Hey, Edie, I remember Allison saying that once. There was another famous author, I think Karen Robards, who said, "If they're paying you to make the change, make the change." Makes sense to me. ;-)

Renee Ryan said...

Vince,

Oooo, you make an interesting point about clever writers weaving in the backstory seamlessly. Sometimes, I'm not so clever. =)~

I'm grinning about your comment that The Marshal Takes a Bride wore you out. It was fast paced, probably because the first draft was 400 pages. I had to cut 100 pages out so that it would fit the LIH line. I ended up cutting all the let's-have-tea-and-think-this-stuff-over scenes. Nothing extraneous got a chance to stick around. The next book in the series, HANNAH'S BEAU, has a little slower pace. Not much, but a little.

~Renee~

Misty Evans said...

Phew! I have prologues in each of my CIA novels and don't plan to remove them. So far, my editor hasn't asked that I do so, either. Double phew!

Great post, Renee. I agree about The Rules. Guidelines are a better way of viewing them.

All the best with your books!
Misty
www.ReadMistyEvans.com

Renee Ryan said...

Misty, yes, I like the term guidelines better than rules as well. Great point. ;-)

Renee Ryan said...

I'll be drawing the winner of the free copy in about an hour, so hurry, hurry, make a quick post so you can be entered.

Leslie Ann said...

Hi Renee,
Welcome back! Very nice post.

I think you have to do whatever makes the story the best read. Simple. If it's creating a prologue then there should be one. Info dumps are the worst!

And interesting thought about Chapter 1 vs using "prologue."

Hugs
~LA

Renee Ryan said...

And the winner is...

drumroll please...

Keri Ford. Yay, Keri.

All you need to do is send your snail mail address to my email:

renee@reneeryan.com

I'll mail your copy of THE MARSHAL TAKES A BRIDE right away.

~Renee~

Donnell said...

Renee, thanks for taking so much time away from your busy schedule. I know you're on deadline and it's much appreciate. Best of luck with A Marshal Takes a Bride.

Vince said...

Hi All:

I just started reading “Undead and Unappreciated” by MaryJanice Davidson and guess what? It has two prologues. How bad is that? And doesn’t she sell a lot of books? LOL.

Vince